Seminar paper from the year 2003 in the subject English Language and Literature Studies - Comparative Literature, grade: 1,7 (A-), University of Bayreuth (English Literature), course: Literature and Media Transformations, language: English, abstract: ""When a great artist in one medium produces a work based on a masterpiece in the same or other medium, we can expect interesting results"" (E. N. Dorall: Conrad and Coppola: Different Centres of Darkness). In his essay The Rethoric of Narrative in Fiction And Film, film critic Seymore Chatman observes that a lot of ink has been spilled in recent years on film adaptations of novels (...). Too much of the discussion has centred on questions of story content, with particular respect to fidelity, as if the source novel were some sacrosanct object whose letter as well as spirit the film had to follow. He continues that this approach often leads to an unproductive prescriptivism that finds the film inadequate because it does not read like the novel. It seems that John Milius and Francis Ford Coppola who both wrote the screenplay for the movie Apocalypse Now, had the same thoughts in mind when they decided to adapt Conrads novel Heart of Darkness -as Milius stated himself - in some shape or form. They certainly did not want to spill any ink and he also did not see the novel as a sacrosanct object. Apocalypse Now is not a conventional film adaptation of Conrads novel since -at least at first glance- it does not pay particular respect to fidelity; a Vietnam war movie does not seem to have much in common with a novel written in 1898 and dealing with colonialism. However, it is said that HD can be seen as the root for AN, because a seventeen-year old John Milius heard his English reader, Irwin Blackter, extol the splendour of Conrads novel Heart of Darkness"". And if we take a closer look at the movie, the parallels to Conrads novel become obvious. This essay will be divided into two major parts. The first one